You're welcome. I strongly dislike cuts on my own f-list; they slow down my reading and when I'm in a hurry, I know I miss stuff because I don't click through. Also, often I load pages when I'm going to have time when I can look at the computer away from the internet, so then I can't click through, I can only read what's already loaded. That's probably part of why I sometimes forget to use them when I'm tired or distracted. But I know more people like than than hate them, so I try to remember.
I'm glad I was still awake (barely) last night and could fix your f-list while this post was high enough on the list to make a difference!
Also, it's cool to know you're reading/viewing, and enjoying! Thanks for commenting.
I can understand your distaste for cuts...in my case, your entry made it impossible for me to respond to your entry unless I shrank the text and images down to microscopic, so that the reply-link would show up on my screen. It's *really* disruptive of my reading. (And a testament to your artwork, that I decided to go to the effort. :)
I bet if you clicked on my header, which (at least in my experience) switches the format to my style, you wouldn't have to shrink things. Since I'll doubtless forget again.
Now I'll have to click through to look at your journal in your style, just to see what it looks like!
From your description--no wonder you called it "broken"!
It's not my journal style, it's the fact that I'm on a netbook, so I have a necessarily small screen, and I can't adjust the resolution on my display.
I can't access headers or anything when an entry is too wide - it centers across my screen and I have to shrink things down to get to any of the header or reply links. I can't figure out who made the entry, or in what community or journal, etc - I have to shrink everything, and stab at the very small target area. I *HATE* it.
I'm at 1024x600 as max resolution. If your 640x480 images are arrayed vertically, I'm okay. If they're two across, as yours were, that extra 256 px is spread to be 128 on the left and right of inaccessible, carrying reply-links and originator information right along with it. I'd have to use a format that put those items in the middle of the page in order to have them available no matter what. YUCK.
I intended creepy--the prompt was "wild ride" which made me think of the wild hunt. Sadly, I found I was too tired to maintain the proper focus for depicting the details in my head, so it morped a bit in the execution.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-01-08 07:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-01-08 07:36 am (UTC)Love the skeletal horses especially.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-01-08 05:05 pm (UTC)I'm glad I was still awake (barely) last night and could fix your f-list while this post was high enough on the list to make a difference!
Also, it's cool to know you're reading/viewing, and enjoying! Thanks for commenting.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-01-08 10:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-01-08 10:25 pm (UTC)I bet if you clicked on my header, which (at least in my experience) switches the format to my style, you wouldn't have to shrink things. Since I'll doubtless forget again.
Now I'll have to click through to look at your journal in your style, just to see what it looks like!
From your description--no wonder you called it "broken"!
(no subject)
Date: 2011-01-08 10:57 pm (UTC)I can't access headers or anything when an entry is too wide - it centers across my screen and I have to shrink things down to get to any of the header or reply links. I can't figure out who made the entry, or in what community or journal, etc - I have to shrink everything, and stab at the very small target area. I *HATE* it.
I'm at 1024x600 as max resolution. If your 640x480 images are arrayed vertically, I'm okay. If they're two across, as yours were, that extra 256 px is spread to be 128 on the left and right of inaccessible, carrying reply-links and originator information right along with it. I'd have to use a format that put those items in the middle of the page in order to have them available no matter what. YUCK.
Ewwwwww!
Date: 2011-01-08 11:23 pm (UTC)It would probably also help to manually put carriage returns between photos.
I suspect this icon is appropriate for the experience!
Re: Ewwwwww!
Date: 2011-01-08 11:35 pm (UTC)Manual carriage returns would solve the problem, unless you're using very large images, yes.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-01-08 09:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-01-08 04:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-01-08 06:22 pm (UTC)LOL
Date: 2011-01-08 10:09 pm (UTC)